Quiz-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
Premium Practice Questions
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Unlock Your Full Report
You missed {missed_count} questions. Enter your email to see exactly which ones you got wrong and read the detailed explanations.
Submit to instantly unlock detailed explanations for every question.
Success! Your results are now unlocked. You can see the correct answers and detailed explanations below.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
You are the product governance lead at a fund administrator. While working on Workplace Violence Prevention during data protection, you receive a suspicious activity escalation. The issue is that a senior systems engineer has demonstrated a pattern of erratic behavior and verbal aggression following a negative performance review 48 hours ago. Security logs indicate this individual has attempted to access the primary data center outside of authorized hours, and colleagues have reported hearing specific threats directed at the executive leadership team. Which of the following is the most appropriate initial step for the organization to take in accordance with workplace violence prevention best practices?
Correct
Correct: A multidisciplinary threat assessment team (TAT) is the industry-standard approach for managing workplace violence risks. This team, comprising experts from HR, legal, security, and management, ensures that the situation is analyzed from multiple perspectives to prevent escalation, protect organizational assets, and ensure compliance with labor laws and privacy regulations.
Incorrect: Immediate revocation of access and physical removal without a formal assessment can sometimes provoke the very violence the organization seeks to prevent and may lead to legal liability if not handled according to policy. Referral to an EAP is a supportive measure but is insufficient as a primary security response when active threats and unauthorized access attempts have occurred. Covert surveillance focuses on evidence gathering for prosecution rather than the immediate prevention of harm and the management of the behavioral threat.
Takeaway: Effective workplace violence prevention relies on a multidisciplinary threat assessment team to evaluate behavioral indicators and implement coordinated intervention strategies.
Incorrect
Correct: A multidisciplinary threat assessment team (TAT) is the industry-standard approach for managing workplace violence risks. This team, comprising experts from HR, legal, security, and management, ensures that the situation is analyzed from multiple perspectives to prevent escalation, protect organizational assets, and ensure compliance with labor laws and privacy regulations.
Incorrect: Immediate revocation of access and physical removal without a formal assessment can sometimes provoke the very violence the organization seeks to prevent and may lead to legal liability if not handled according to policy. Referral to an EAP is a supportive measure but is insufficient as a primary security response when active threats and unauthorized access attempts have occurred. Covert surveillance focuses on evidence gathering for prosecution rather than the immediate prevention of harm and the management of the behavioral threat.
Takeaway: Effective workplace violence prevention relies on a multidisciplinary threat assessment team to evaluate behavioral indicators and implement coordinated intervention strategies.
-
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
During a periodic assessment of Human Resource Considerations during Disasters as part of sanctions screening at a payment services provider, auditors observed that the current Business Continuity Plan (BCP) lacks specific provisions for the unavailability of the lead compliance officer, who holds sole authority for overriding false-positive sanctions alerts. Given a 24-hour Recovery Time Objective (RTO) for high-value international transfers, which of the following measures is most essential to address this human resource risk?
Correct
Correct: Succession planning and cross-training are fundamental components of the ‘People’ element in Business Continuity Planning. By ensuring that multiple individuals are trained and authorized to perform critical tasks, the organization eliminates a single point of failure. This is particularly vital in highly regulated environments like payment services, where specific expertise and authority are required to meet Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) without compromising compliance.
Incorrect: Relying on a single individual to be available 24/7 via satellite phone is a fragile strategy that fails if the individual is incapacitated or dealing with personal emergencies during a disaster. Bypassing manual overrides for transactions introduces significant regulatory and legal risk, as it could lead to the processing of sanctioned entities. While third-party staff augmentation is a valid strategy, it often cannot meet a 24-hour RTO due to the time required for emergency onboarding, background checks, and the specialized knowledge required for sanctions screening.
Takeaway: Effective disaster recovery requires addressing personnel dependencies through succession planning and cross-training to eliminate single points of failure in critical business processes.
Incorrect
Correct: Succession planning and cross-training are fundamental components of the ‘People’ element in Business Continuity Planning. By ensuring that multiple individuals are trained and authorized to perform critical tasks, the organization eliminates a single point of failure. This is particularly vital in highly regulated environments like payment services, where specific expertise and authority are required to meet Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) without compromising compliance.
Incorrect: Relying on a single individual to be available 24/7 via satellite phone is a fragile strategy that fails if the individual is incapacitated or dealing with personal emergencies during a disaster. Bypassing manual overrides for transactions introduces significant regulatory and legal risk, as it could lead to the processing of sanctioned entities. While third-party staff augmentation is a valid strategy, it often cannot meet a 24-hour RTO due to the time required for emergency onboarding, background checks, and the specialized knowledge required for sanctions screening.
Takeaway: Effective disaster recovery requires addressing personnel dependencies through succession planning and cross-training to eliminate single points of failure in critical business processes.
-
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
A procedure review at a mid-sized retail bank has identified gaps in Modes of Operation for Block Ciphers as part of incident response. The review highlights that during the nightly batch processing of transaction logs between 2:00 AM and 4:00 AM, the encryption implementation allowed an unauthorized party to discern patterns in the encrypted data, specifically identifying recurring header structures in customer records. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) needs to determine which block cipher mode was utilized and why it failed to protect the confidentiality of the data patterns.
Correct
Correct: Electronic Codebook (ECB) is the simplest mode of operation. It encrypts each block of plaintext independently with the same key. The primary security weakness of ECB is that identical plaintext blocks produce identical ciphertext blocks, which preserves patterns in the data. In a banking environment where transaction logs have highly structured headers, this allows an attacker to perform frequency analysis or pattern recognition to gain information about the underlying data without needing the decryption key.
Incorrect: Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) uses an initialization vector and chains blocks together so that each ciphertext block depends on all previous blocks, which effectively hides patterns; the idea of an IV being ‘too long’ causing a buffer overflow is not a standard cryptographic failure mode for CBC. Output Feedback (OFB) and Cipher Feedback (CFB) are modes that turn a block cipher into a stream cipher; while they have specific requirements for IV uniqueness, they do not require synchronous clocks for batch processing, nor do they fail on block-based logs due to padding errors in the way described.
Takeaway: Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode should never be used for encrypting structured data because it fails to provide semantic security by leaking plaintext patterns in the ciphertext.
Incorrect
Correct: Electronic Codebook (ECB) is the simplest mode of operation. It encrypts each block of plaintext independently with the same key. The primary security weakness of ECB is that identical plaintext blocks produce identical ciphertext blocks, which preserves patterns in the data. In a banking environment where transaction logs have highly structured headers, this allows an attacker to perform frequency analysis or pattern recognition to gain information about the underlying data without needing the decryption key.
Incorrect: Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) uses an initialization vector and chains blocks together so that each ciphertext block depends on all previous blocks, which effectively hides patterns; the idea of an IV being ‘too long’ causing a buffer overflow is not a standard cryptographic failure mode for CBC. Output Feedback (OFB) and Cipher Feedback (CFB) are modes that turn a block cipher into a stream cipher; while they have specific requirements for IV uniqueness, they do not require synchronous clocks for batch processing, nor do they fail on block-based logs due to padding errors in the way described.
Takeaway: Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode should never be used for encrypting structured data because it fails to provide semantic security by leaking plaintext patterns in the ciphertext.
-
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
Which statement most accurately reflects Quantum Cryptography Concepts for Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) in practice? A security architect is reviewing the organization’s long-term cryptographic strategy to address the emerging threat of cryptanalytically relevant quantum computers (CRQC). The architect must distinguish between different quantum-related security technologies to ensure the appropriate selection of controls for sensitive data protection.
Correct
Correct: This statement correctly distinguishes between the two primary areas of quantum security. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a physical implementation that uses quantum states (like photon polarization) to exchange keys; any attempt to measure or eavesdrop on the quantum system disturbs it, allowing the parties to detect the intrusion. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), also known as quantum-resistant cryptography, involves mathematical algorithms (such as lattice-based or hash-based) that run on classical computers but are believed to be secure against the processing capabilities of future quantum computers.
Incorrect: The second option is incorrect because Shor’s algorithm is a tool used by quantum computers to break, not strengthen, RSA and Diffie-Hellman. The third option is incorrect because Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) is designed to run on existing classical hardware and does not require quantum entanglement or specialized fiber-optic links; those requirements are associated with Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). The fourth option is incorrect because while lattice-based structures are a type of PQC, Grover’s algorithm primarily affects symmetric ciphers by providing a quadratic speedup for brute-force attacks, which is typically mitigated by doubling the key size (e.g., moving from AES-128 to AES-256) rather than replacing the cipher structure entirely.
Takeaway: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) relies on the laws of physics for secure key exchange, while Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) relies on mathematical problems that are computationally difficult for both classical and quantum computers.
Incorrect
Correct: This statement correctly distinguishes between the two primary areas of quantum security. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a physical implementation that uses quantum states (like photon polarization) to exchange keys; any attempt to measure or eavesdrop on the quantum system disturbs it, allowing the parties to detect the intrusion. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), also known as quantum-resistant cryptography, involves mathematical algorithms (such as lattice-based or hash-based) that run on classical computers but are believed to be secure against the processing capabilities of future quantum computers.
Incorrect: The second option is incorrect because Shor’s algorithm is a tool used by quantum computers to break, not strengthen, RSA and Diffie-Hellman. The third option is incorrect because Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) is designed to run on existing classical hardware and does not require quantum entanglement or specialized fiber-optic links; those requirements are associated with Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). The fourth option is incorrect because while lattice-based structures are a type of PQC, Grover’s algorithm primarily affects symmetric ciphers by providing a quadratic speedup for brute-force attacks, which is typically mitigated by doubling the key size (e.g., moving from AES-128 to AES-256) rather than replacing the cipher structure entirely.
Takeaway: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) relies on the laws of physics for secure key exchange, while Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) relies on mathematical problems that are computationally difficult for both classical and quantum computers.
-
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
The board of directors at a broker-dealer has asked for a recommendation regarding Cloud Deployment Models (Public, Private, Hybrid, Multi-cloud) as part of periodic review. The background paper states that the firm currently operates a proprietary high-frequency trading platform requiring sub-millisecond latency within its own data center, but intends to migrate its customer-facing reporting tools and five years of historical transaction logs to a more elastic environment within the next 18 months. The internal audit team has identified that data residency and strict regulatory oversight are primary constraints for the migration project. Which deployment model should the security architect recommend to satisfy the performance needs of the trading platform while achieving the scalability goals for the reporting tools?
Correct
Correct: A hybrid cloud model is the most appropriate solution because it allows the organization to keep high-performance, low-latency, or highly regulated workloads on private infrastructure (on-premises) while taking advantage of the public cloud’s scalability and cost-effectiveness for other services like reporting and archives. This specifically addresses the sub-millisecond latency requirement for the trading platform which is difficult to guarantee in a standard public cloud environment.
Incorrect: A multi-cloud model focuses on using multiple cloud providers to avoid vendor lock-in or increase availability, but it does not inherently address the need to keep specific high-performance workloads on-premises. A community cloud is designed for organizations with shared concerns but does not solve the specific performance-versus-scalability trade-off for a single firm’s internal trading engine. A public cloud model, even with dedicated instances, often introduces variable latency (jitter) that can be unacceptable for high-frequency trading compared to local, direct-attach hardware.
Takeaway: Hybrid cloud environments are the preferred architectural choice when an organization must balance legacy or high-performance local requirements with the scalability and cost benefits of public cloud services.
Incorrect
Correct: A hybrid cloud model is the most appropriate solution because it allows the organization to keep high-performance, low-latency, or highly regulated workloads on private infrastructure (on-premises) while taking advantage of the public cloud’s scalability and cost-effectiveness for other services like reporting and archives. This specifically addresses the sub-millisecond latency requirement for the trading platform which is difficult to guarantee in a standard public cloud environment.
Incorrect: A multi-cloud model focuses on using multiple cloud providers to avoid vendor lock-in or increase availability, but it does not inherently address the need to keep specific high-performance workloads on-premises. A community cloud is designed for organizations with shared concerns but does not solve the specific performance-versus-scalability trade-off for a single firm’s internal trading engine. A public cloud model, even with dedicated instances, often introduces variable latency (jitter) that can be unacceptable for high-frequency trading compared to local, direct-attach hardware.
Takeaway: Hybrid cloud environments are the preferred architectural choice when an organization must balance legacy or high-performance local requirements with the scalability and cost benefits of public cloud services.
-
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
The internal auditor at a fintech lender is tasked with addressing Ethical Hacking Laws and Regulations during conflicts of interest. After reviewing a policy exception request, the key concern is that a senior DevOps engineer is seeking authorization to perform an aggressive vulnerability assessment on a legacy payment gateway they currently maintain. The engineer intends to use personal scripts to bypass existing security controls within a 48-hour window before a major system migration. This request bypasses the standard third-party security review process. Which of the following considerations is most critical for the auditor to highlight regarding the legal and regulatory risks of granting this exception?
Correct
Correct: The legal distinction between ethical hacking and criminal activity relies heavily on the concept of authorized access. Without a formal charter and a strictly defined Rules of Engagement (ROE) document that provides independent oversight, an individual performing testing on their own system may inadvertently exceed their scope of authority, leading to potential liability under statutes such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
Incorrect: Prohibiting internal employees from testing systems they manage is a matter of internal control and separation of duties rather than a specific legal mandate under Sarbanes-Oxley. The Wassenaar Arrangement is an international export control regime for dual-use goods and does not govern the internal use of scripts within a single organization. Federal security clearances are required for handling classified government information, not for standard commercial financial transaction testing.
Takeaway: The legality of ethical hacking is predicated on explicit, documented authorization and adherence to a defined scope, which is compromised when testing is performed without independent oversight.
Incorrect
Correct: The legal distinction between ethical hacking and criminal activity relies heavily on the concept of authorized access. Without a formal charter and a strictly defined Rules of Engagement (ROE) document that provides independent oversight, an individual performing testing on their own system may inadvertently exceed their scope of authority, leading to potential liability under statutes such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
Incorrect: Prohibiting internal employees from testing systems they manage is a matter of internal control and separation of duties rather than a specific legal mandate under Sarbanes-Oxley. The Wassenaar Arrangement is an international export control regime for dual-use goods and does not govern the internal use of scripts within a single organization. Federal security clearances are required for handling classified government information, not for standard commercial financial transaction testing.
Takeaway: The legality of ethical hacking is predicated on explicit, documented authorization and adherence to a defined scope, which is compromised when testing is performed without independent oversight.
-
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
When operationalizing Symmetric Encryption Algorithms (e.g., AES, DES, 3DES), what is the recommended method for ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of high-volume data transfers in a modern cloud architecture?
Correct
Correct: AES in Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is the preferred choice for modern high-performance environments. It provides Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD), which ensures both confidentiality and integrity/authenticity in a single operation. Furthermore, because GCM is a stream-based mode derived from counter mode, it allows for parallelization, making it significantly faster and more efficient for high-volume data than block-chaining methods.
Incorrect: Triple DES (3DES) is considered legacy and is being retired by NIST due to its 64-bit block size, which is vulnerable to birthday attacks like Sweet32, and its relative inefficiency compared to AES. Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode is highly insecure for anything beyond small, random data (like keys) because it encrypts identical plaintext blocks into identical ciphertext blocks, revealing patterns in the data. Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) requires a unique, unpredictable initialization vector (IV) for every encryption; using a fixed or static IV allows attackers to perform pattern analysis and compromises the security of the encryption.
Takeaway: AES-GCM is the modern standard for symmetric encryption because it combines high-speed parallel processing with built-in integrity checks through authenticated encryption.
Incorrect
Correct: AES in Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is the preferred choice for modern high-performance environments. It provides Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD), which ensures both confidentiality and integrity/authenticity in a single operation. Furthermore, because GCM is a stream-based mode derived from counter mode, it allows for parallelization, making it significantly faster and more efficient for high-volume data than block-chaining methods.
Incorrect: Triple DES (3DES) is considered legacy and is being retired by NIST due to its 64-bit block size, which is vulnerable to birthday attacks like Sweet32, and its relative inefficiency compared to AES. Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode is highly insecure for anything beyond small, random data (like keys) because it encrypts identical plaintext blocks into identical ciphertext blocks, revealing patterns in the data. Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) requires a unique, unpredictable initialization vector (IV) for every encryption; using a fixed or static IV allows attackers to perform pattern analysis and compromises the security of the encryption.
Takeaway: AES-GCM is the modern standard for symmetric encryption because it combines high-speed parallel processing with built-in integrity checks through authenticated encryption.
-
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
The supervisory authority has issued an inquiry to a payment services provider concerning Microservices Security in Development in the context of incident response. The letter states that during a recent 48-hour service disruption, the provider’s distributed architecture hindered the identification of the root cause due to inconsistent logging formats across 50+ independent services. The regulator is specifically concerned with how security requirements were integrated into the CI/CD pipeline to ensure forensic readiness and rapid containment. Which of the following strategies best addresses the regulator’s concern regarding the integration of security into the development lifecycle for microservices to support incident response?
Correct
Correct: In a microservices environment, the sidecar pattern allows for the offloading of cross-cutting concerns like logging and monitoring to a separate container, ensuring consistency across diverse services. Validating trace ID propagation through automated testing ensures that a single transaction can be tracked across the entire distributed system, which is essential for forensic analysis and root cause identification during an incident response scenario.
Incorrect: Refactoring to a monolith is an impractical and regressive step that negates the benefits of scalability and independent deployment inherent in microservices. Manual checklists are insufficient for ensuring technical observability and are prone to human error in high-velocity CI/CD environments. Perimeter-based firewalls focus on north-south traffic but do not address the internal east-west visibility or the logging consistency issues required for effective incident response within the service mesh.
Takeaway: Effective incident response in microservices requires standardized observability and correlation mechanisms, such as trace IDs and sidecar logging, to be integrated into the architectural design and deployment pipeline.
Incorrect
Correct: In a microservices environment, the sidecar pattern allows for the offloading of cross-cutting concerns like logging and monitoring to a separate container, ensuring consistency across diverse services. Validating trace ID propagation through automated testing ensures that a single transaction can be tracked across the entire distributed system, which is essential for forensic analysis and root cause identification during an incident response scenario.
Incorrect: Refactoring to a monolith is an impractical and regressive step that negates the benefits of scalability and independent deployment inherent in microservices. Manual checklists are insufficient for ensuring technical observability and are prone to human error in high-velocity CI/CD environments. Perimeter-based firewalls focus on north-south traffic but do not address the internal east-west visibility or the logging consistency issues required for effective incident response within the service mesh.
Takeaway: Effective incident response in microservices requires standardized observability and correlation mechanisms, such as trace IDs and sidecar logging, to be integrated into the architectural design and deployment pipeline.
-
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
During a committee meeting at a fintech lender, a question arises about Eradication and Recovery Procedures as part of onboarding. The discussion reveals that several junior analysts are confused about the transition between removing a threat and returning to normal operations. A recent incident involving a SQL injection attack on a customer-facing portal resulted in a 48-hour downtime because the recovery team restored a backup that was still vulnerable to the same exploit. To prevent a recurrence of the incident during the recovery phase, which action should the incident response team prioritize during the eradication phase?
Correct
Correct: Eradication is the phase where the root cause of the incident is eliminated. In the context of a technical exploit like SQL injection, this involves not just removing any malicious scripts or backdoors, but also patching the underlying vulnerability in the code or configuration. If the vulnerability is not remediated during eradication, the system will remain susceptible to the exact same attack immediately upon being restored to the production environment during the recovery phase.
Incorrect: Restoring the most recent backup immediately focuses on availability but ignores the integrity and security of the system, likely leading to a repeat of the incident if the vulnerability or the malware is present in the backup. Performing forensic imaging is a critical part of the containment and evidence collection process, but it does not address the eradication of the threat or the preparation for recovery. Conducting a lessons-learned session is the final stage of the incident response lifecycle (Post-Incident Activity) and occurs after the systems have been successfully recovered and stabilized.
Takeaway: Effective eradication requires addressing the root cause and vulnerabilities to ensure that the threat does not re-emerge once the system is restored to production.
Incorrect
Correct: Eradication is the phase where the root cause of the incident is eliminated. In the context of a technical exploit like SQL injection, this involves not just removing any malicious scripts or backdoors, but also patching the underlying vulnerability in the code or configuration. If the vulnerability is not remediated during eradication, the system will remain susceptible to the exact same attack immediately upon being restored to the production environment during the recovery phase.
Incorrect: Restoring the most recent backup immediately focuses on availability but ignores the integrity and security of the system, likely leading to a repeat of the incident if the vulnerability or the malware is present in the backup. Performing forensic imaging is a critical part of the containment and evidence collection process, but it does not address the eradication of the threat or the preparation for recovery. Conducting a lessons-learned session is the final stage of the incident response lifecycle (Post-Incident Activity) and occurs after the systems have been successfully recovered and stabilized.
Takeaway: Effective eradication requires addressing the root cause and vulnerabilities to ensure that the threat does not re-emerge once the system is restored to production.
-
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
If concerns emerge regarding Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP), what is the recommended course of action? An organization is transitioning its monolithic applications into a microservices architecture deployed across several public cloud providers. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is concerned that traditional perimeter-based security and standard endpoint security tools are insufficient for protecting these dynamic, short-lived workloads. To address these concerns and ensure a robust security posture, which strategy should the security architecture team prioritize?
Correct
Correct: A Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) is specifically designed to address the unique security requirements of cloud workloads, which are often ephemeral and span multiple environments. By providing centralized visibility and consistent policy enforcement across VMs, containers, and serverless functions, the organization can manage vulnerabilities and detect runtime threats effectively, regardless of where the workload is hosted. This aligns with the CISSP domain of Security Architecture and Engineering by ensuring protection is workload-centric rather than perimeter-centric.
Incorrect: Relying solely on native tools in a multi-cloud environment creates security silos, leading to inconsistent policies and visibility gaps across different providers. Standardizing on a single vendor is a business strategy that may reduce complexity but does not inherently solve the technical challenges of protecting dynamic workloads. Network Detection and Response (NDR) focuses on traffic patterns but lacks the deep visibility into the workload’s internal state, such as file integrity and process monitoring, which is a core requirement for comprehensive workload protection.
Takeaway: CWPP provides a unified security framework for protecting diverse and elastic cloud workloads across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
Incorrect
Correct: A Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) is specifically designed to address the unique security requirements of cloud workloads, which are often ephemeral and span multiple environments. By providing centralized visibility and consistent policy enforcement across VMs, containers, and serverless functions, the organization can manage vulnerabilities and detect runtime threats effectively, regardless of where the workload is hosted. This aligns with the CISSP domain of Security Architecture and Engineering by ensuring protection is workload-centric rather than perimeter-centric.
Incorrect: Relying solely on native tools in a multi-cloud environment creates security silos, leading to inconsistent policies and visibility gaps across different providers. Standardizing on a single vendor is a business strategy that may reduce complexity but does not inherently solve the technical challenges of protecting dynamic workloads. Network Detection and Response (NDR) focuses on traffic patterns but lacks the deep visibility into the workload’s internal state, such as file integrity and process monitoring, which is a core requirement for comprehensive workload protection.
Takeaway: CWPP provides a unified security framework for protecting diverse and elastic cloud workloads across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.